MAPPING MESSIANIC JEWISH PHENOMENA

The mysterious dark secular Jew from Prague, but culturally German, lived from 1883 to 1924, and died at the young age of 40 by tuberculosis. He was a failed writer in his time, but posthumously world famous, a legendary literary figure.  Around 1917-1918 he wrote a series of aphorisms  in his notebooks, including this one about the Messiah: The Messiah will come as soon as the most unbridled individualism of faith becomes possible--when there is no one to destroy this possib

This is a great opportunity for a word on the Theologico-Political   Fragment  of Walter Benjamin, an article on the Messiah, by the legendary intellectual. It is opportune because Taubes writing on Paul references it particularly! saying that the nihilism of Paul is that nihilism of Benjamin’s Fragment... Benjamin says, according to Taubes, that only the Messiah completes all of history. Nothing inside history stands alone separately - all things are measured in relation to

I find this section more straightforward. It is spiritual experience, or in my terms spiritualization of and mystical phenomena, in regards to the absentee messianic figure in my terms, in Paul’s terms, the real and actually present Messiah, through Spiritual Experience. Every Word is This Actually Albert Schweizer wrote a book a hundred years ago called “Mysticism of the Apostle Paul” which says it all. It works through Paul's writing and shows how every phrase is a mystical

Continuing the ‘REAL Paul’ theme, not the theoretical or philosophical pawn of modern thinkers, we previously considered how realistically Paul thinks of the apocalypse and the paradoxical disposition he is in, himself and his constituents. We continue the real Paul realistic thinking, and engage in loads of textual evidence in 2 categories - what we refer to as political, and mystical . Taubes went off on a tangent speaking of Paul’s politicalness. He was excited about the t

By the way, according to the large majority of scholars only these writings were authored by Paul himself - 1 Thessalonians, 1 and 2 Corinthians, Galatians, Philippians, Romans, Philemon. Other writings attributed to his original authorship are contested by some or many historians. So then we do take those additional epistles, as well as Acts of the Apostles , and consider them... Now, if we are to read Paul it is very important to understand that he is a realist, and a real

As mentioned in previous posts, I wrote my master’s degree thesis on the messianism of Paul, Pauline Messianism . That is how I got started on the track of researching messianism here!  It starts with Paul. Paul was and is a complicated, provocative and misunderstood character. His letters and thoughts and words are often ambiguous, if not contradictory! ... which is evident by the fact that until today religious scholars and critical historians continue to argue and research

Throughout this series, the whole point was to take apart any narrow approach to the subject matter, of messiah yes or no, this type of messiah, versus a broad complex approach, seeing all sorts of messianisms, aspects of messianism in so many places and people in Jewish history. This approach is applied to the case of Professor Gershom Scholem as well. How can we simplify the question of his own ideological messianism? How was it mixed into his research - was his research af

Unlike many intellectuals, Gershom Scholem had no problem talking about messianism. He didn’t try to sweep it under the rug, or overlook it when presenting narratives of Jewish history. He also was open about his ideas for the Zionist state before and after independence in 1948. And he was open about how the historical research worked into his ideas of contemporary politics. However, when it comes to messianism, he was open but arguably inconsistent or self-contradictory. Ben

Ben-Gurion came from the socialist environment and all that idealism, but turned to Zionism. He was revisionistic like the socialists in their mindset, wanting to change the world, harbouring ideals, but was realistic and careful and pragmatic.   On a philosophical level, he understood the problem, if idealism replaces practical objectives. An ideal should remain as an ideal, something theoretical.  This approach is close to the post-communist thinkers, who were at first zeal

Where to go from here? We mentioned the 1840 messianic movement, the precursors of Zionism who merged traditional messianic ideas with contemporary nationalism, Herzl himself was observed as inspired by it, and the Rav Kook embodied traditional messianism, modern nationalism, and the beginnings of the new state and society on his soul. The last 2 individuals to be observed are the statesman Ben-Gurion and the scholar Gershom Scholem . Ben Gurion was enormously influential of

We looked at a few levels and aspects of the Rav Kook. In his eulogy for Herzl, we saw a homily of messianic scriptures and sources, like the precursors of Zionism, in regards to the new Jewish state on the way. Then we reviewed some milestones in his lifetime, observing that he is one who is always on the move, active, and caught between different forces which considers to be complimentary and paradoxical not opposite. Then we mentioned a few principles of his worldview, of

Understanding the fundamentals of this man really is like a building and a spiral - there are multiple levels, and then you can go through them again and sense more and more depth each time. Previously there were some milestones of his life. Now for his intellectual milestones… He was an intellectual. He was a thinker. For the duration of his life he was studying and thinking and writing. To understand this man, like we mentioned above, he went through a lot and was always mo